Originally Posted by
LeineLodge
This is mostly incorrect. You are stating this as fact, when it is your opinion.
1. The company is trending towards noncompliance
2. They can't be out of compliance until the end of the 3 yr measurement period
3. If they are out of compliance (which it looks like they might be) at that time, we will go from there
There-in lies the problem (bolded part).
Are we going to effectively "sell" scope (jobs) in exchange for some type of monetary/contractual gain as compensation for the violation, or are we going to try and enforce our scope as it is written and tell the company to comply....
Seems from history that some sort of relief for the company is the likely case.