Originally Posted by
LeineLodge
This is mostly incorrect. You are stating this as fact, when it is your opinion.
1. The company is trending towards noncompliance
2. They can't be out of compliance until the end of the 3 yr measurement period
3. If they are out of compliance (which it looks like they might be) at that time, we will go from there
Everything else you posted is your opinion, and bordering on paranoia. The "fair share" buzzword is being overhyped and taken out of context. Nobody is selling you anything. This issue is receiving the proper amount of attention from your union. Check with your rep if you don't believe me.
Leine,
Respectfully, I disagree with you.
Paranoia would maybe be correct if Republic did not receive (scope noncompliance) language in section 1 of c2012 after we were told for 2-3 years that they were in compliance and we just couldn't read.
The proof will be in the pudding. What the union does when we are at the end of the measurement window will be the determiner of whether anyone is justifiably distrustful or pessimistic, or whether they were correct on their assessment of past practice being a predictor of future actions.