Originally Posted by
Captain Tony
You're looking at this whole thing from a management/business owner point of view. Most of us in this industry became pilots because we didn't want to be part of the cubicle culture. The airline industry and its pyramid scheme seniority system (where the higher the pay the less you work) has been in place since its inception. You are decrying this system, but its never going to change. In fact, it's a big reason why many of us do this day in and day out.
You also act like management compensation occurs in a vacuum. If the company was profitable and growing,and we were getting raises along with management, no one would care. But when the company isn't growing or profitable, management needs to embrace shared sacrifice. For them to tell us we're too expensive and need to give concessions, then award themselves a raise (regardless of whether its 12% or 83%) is out of whack, and really a slap in the face. Obviously we don't need to give THAT bad if they can afford to pay him that handsomely to attend meetings and smoke cigarettes out front all day. You act like BH invented this whole thing. BH is just COO. He takes orders directly from SGU and implements them. He functions like a senior VP, yet gets paid like a CEO. And to use your argument, it's not justified for the amount of work he performs.
I don't have an opinion of BH. As stated before, my comments were based on info from guys like you.
I realize that my point of view is that of a business owner, since I have been for much of the last 25 years, which is why my opinions are what they are from a business standpoint. Logic would say that you can't consistently pay people more to accomplish less and remain viable for the long term. If that is possible, tell me how.
As far as the management/pilot debate is concerned, I think it's obvious that I got tired of the cubicle and would prefer to be here. I would, however, like to leave this place better once I move on.