Originally Posted by
rickair7777
the FAA's decision making in this situation is well within the scope of their regulatory authority.
Of course those of us in the industry know that aviation training is inherently vocational, not educational...sort of like a BS degree in welding or truck driving.
If they grant an exception for "Aviation Studies" they should grant an exception for all engineering and science degrees. Hell, make it all four-year degrees.
This is the point for a lawsuit, and those who have said there is no difference between the MIT guy and someone else make my case for me.
The part in red above makes the case for a lawsuit against the FAA for indefensible job discrimination based upon licensing.
A four year degree is a four year degree. Period. Just because someone went to K St. and majored in Aviation doesn't mean that person is more qualified than the MIT engineering guy (or anyone from another 4 year program) who has the exact same time and ratings.
Originally Posted by
rickair7777
The decision holds up well in the light of day, at least to the general public...a typical juror, judge, or average citizen will see nothing wrong with extra credit for someone who focused their education on aviation.
At first glance, yes.
At the end of a trail, after expert testimony from folks like yourself, I don't think so. Just my opinion.