I had not heard about that.....What Council was it??

Was the individual(s) being "disruptive", not following "Robert's Rules", "Obstructive", Not in "good Union standing", ect......What was the reason for them being "asked" to leave??

I don't care who you are (Legacy 'whoever'), if an individual(s) is displaying/acting in such an obstructive manner, I would expect the situation to be rectified. If that means having those displaying such behavior/standing being asked to comply with the bounds/rules of an official LEC meeting, or leave, so be it.

I would like to hear some of the actual surrounding facts of the allegations above.

Thanks for bringing that up.