Originally Posted by
LAX Pilot
Apparently someone asked what happens if the ISL looks more like the UAL list does the CAL side have any recourse, so they asked the L-UAL guys to leave so they could discuss it without them.
And also apparently they left without making a big deal.
The funny thing is I'm sure there are ex-scabs who were let back into ALPA when it reformed who were allowed to stay and listen.
So I guess at CAL the unions only represent some of the pilots and not all of them.
You gotta wonder about a union that lets scabs stay in the meeting and throws out pilots who not only never crossed a picket line, AND who have been through a furlough.
Interesting.......
Saw this from Ben on anther thread. May want to converse with the V/C (or S/T) directly to see if he'd put a "brief" in writing since the above said actions would have to be held w/in the minutes of an official LEC meeting.
It would be a nice litmus test to see if "one" get's a returned phone call.....Rumor has it that some within the current Council are not too good at returning phone requests, even for those who they directly represent.....just saying.
Originally Posted by
A320fumes
Not my council, so I won't speak to it. Contact Rob Slovitski, NYC Vice-Chair.
I will say that procedurally, in IAH, we always request a motion from the floor to admit non-iah members, usually for wives or members from other councils. We've always gotten that motion, and NO IAH Pilot (LUAL included) have ever objected to admitting and wife, child, LCAL or LUAL member.
That's is how we handle it in IAH.
Over-and Out.
-Ben