I saw no new information in either the TRO filing or the CO MC filing. The TRO filing held no ground with the judge. Did the information hold any ground with the arbs? We don't know yet, or at least most of us don't. It was presented once already, months ago.

Almost sounds like the CO MC does know that that argument was already dismissed, and the arbs didn't choose the CO moonshot ISL proposal.

We will see tomorrow.