View Single Post
Old 09-03-2013 | 03:05 PM
  #138660  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
How Purple came off my ignore list, I do not know, but he's been trying to lay down arguments that didn't sound like tantrums, and I've been doing him the courtesy of reading his stuff without automatically disagreeing.

Even though I don't agree with him at all on the DPA/ALPA discussion, I had a similar reaction to your post. If you're going to talk about the strengths of ALPA, or the weaknesses of DPA, you have a lot to work with.

ALPA's approach to MEMRAT is probably not on the top ten.

I've been ready, willing, and able to vote on a lot of significant LOA's, but alas, my participation has not been required. The real lever we have is in electing good reps, and booting them if we're dissatisfied. That's about it. Furthermore, considering the various NDA's, I've been having to trust my reps to make the right choice, even though I can't peek over their shoulder at the data, to confirm they've arrived at the right conclusion.

DPA looks like an inferior product to me. I don't see the plan, and I don't see the point. myALPA comes with a number of better features, but an unlimited MEMRAT plan isn't one of them.
Long ago, I came to the conclusion that NDAs only serve to distance reps from those who they represent and nothing else.

Additionally, the decision as to what constitutes a "significant" contract change is never our decision to make, thereby (theirbuy? they're by?) removing the teeth from MEMRAT.

Last edited by scambo1; 09-03-2013 at 03:16 PM.