Originally Posted by
Really
I haven't read the ruling. However, in my case your above statement is incorrect. There was a flow through agreement that I was part of but the IACP came on property 5 yrs later. There were many different agreements, thats the problem! The ISL puts it all to bed thankfully!!
Right, if you were britt or bar harbor than I see your point. However, lots of those guys were actually interviewed and hired by mainline CAL in 1989/90 and merely staffed at coex because they had an ATP and they needed captains at the feeder. They were all told they would be at coex for a short time. guys hired the same day without an ATP went as engineers to CAL. Essentially, the guys who went to the feeder got penalized for having more time, experience, and credentials.
I was referring to the agreement that IACP negotiated. I think there was two formal negotiated flow through agreements that brought guys over on a 3 to 1 ratio following an interview and sim check at mainline CAL. It was actually easier to get to CAL in the late 90's off the street than it was if you were a pilot at COEX.
List has big problems. Not sure how you go from 43% to 66%. Fair and equitable my ...foot.