Originally Posted by
David Watts
So let's use the 2010 snapshot. A UAL 1999 hire was at 100%. If CAL can't use the new hires over the years since 2010 then UAL can not count the furloughed guys to bump up their relative seniority.
See how this works.
Is that what the arbitrators determined?
Follow the merger policy. 2010 is the date and the furloughees had longevity.
Stop trying to use "other factors" to effect SLI. It didn't work out so well for your leadership.