Originally Posted by
meyers9163
What if AA needs 50 seater AC gone? What if the merger doesn't go through? What if we bomb Syria? This deal, although BS, at least assure a 44 fleet airline. Perhaps some view that better then a 14 fleet airline. To each their own.
Plus you all scream AE had a better deal.... That's BS. No way you agree to 60 planes to eliminate 200 and accept a by definition B scale and tell me that's better.
Further more until Obama Care is implemented none of us know what cost we'll get passed on. That's a huge elephant none of us know.....
Continue on Eagle and PDT guys in a thread that you ultimately are ****ing people off in and probably getting more yes votes because you're building resentment towards your airlines by your behaviour here. Congrats on getting PSA and management more yes votes based on your hijacking of a thread not concerning you.
I'm not saying you should fall on a sword for the betterment of anything, but if you think this has only to do with PSA you have completely lost touch of reality and need to reevaluate. And if in fact you vote yes because of spite due to Eage and PDT by "highjacking" this thread that apparently you own, again please get back in touch with reality.
This has EVERYTHING to do with (a) trying not to degrade the industry and contracts (whether current or future); (b) preventing any management from simply bouncing from one carrier to another trying to get what they want.
So if you're so inclined to vote yes, do so but with clear acknowledgement of your actions and potential future repercussions. Let me be clear, I am not trying to tell you or anyone at PSA how you should vote but you and everyone involved needs to make a clear rational decision and not out of spite and thinking you (PSA pilots) are the only one's affected.
I wish you and your group the best of luck...the industry is watching.