View Single Post
Old 09-05-2013 | 05:00 PM
  #139071  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Carl Spackler
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
What eventualities? Excessively long Sec 6 periods?
With the RLA, management pretty much gets to decide how long section 6 periods last. Always smart to be funded for all eventualities.

Originally Posted by johnso29
Last time I checked, they do work for us. Can you prove otherwise?
My opinion is that we were not served by the MEC administrators that were recently removed. It is my further opinion that one of the reasons they got so far off the tracks was this concept of management directly funding union people doing union work. YMMV.

Originally Posted by johnso29
Do you have evidence to refute that claim? And for the record, I've never referred to USAPA as highlighted above. But they are a dysfunctional failure. Their contract and refusal to follow what they legally agreed to are evidence.
You did describe USAPA that way, but that's not the point. The point is your attempt at discrediting the Seham firm for being fired from a dysfunctional failure. Can't have it both ways.

Originally Posted by johnso29
$1 million dollars is adequate access?
Yes, especially for an organization that hasn't been voted in yet.

Originally Posted by johnso29
And what's the interest rate?
Don't know.

Originally Posted by johnso29
What happens when the lawsuits against DPA start?
Call Kitty Hawk.

Originally Posted by johnso29
When was ALPA ever against Age 60?
ALPA was initially strongly opposed to any change to the age 60 retirement rule.

Originally Posted by johnso29
And I'm fairly certain 1500 hours is still the new requirement.
In spite of ALPA's attempts to lower the 1,500 hour minimum.

Originally Posted by johnso29
A great start? I think they are running a little behind their desired timeline.
Timeline has been slow to be sure, but still very exciting prospect.

Carl