Originally Posted by
Sink r8
Thanks for the reply.
Ultimately, all I want is us to bring our A game. I think imposing this power struggle, framed as a representation discussion, is completely overshadowing the discussion about how to best bring our A game, as a unified group.
This should be all about getting the best people in place, to effect the most intelligent actions. If this was a very tough debate about philosophies, and the future of constructive engagement, I think it would be very healthy.
Sink,
I don't like NDAs. Yet, I suspect C12 had something to do with our S&P 500 listing...the way it was negotiated, the rates, the whole thing...partly due to NDAs. Does that mean we brought our A game?
I don't know if there is a quid in the future for us due to the S&P listing, I hope there is, but here is the thing: We don't know.
If there is a positive strategic direction Richard wants to take this company in, why not share it rather than piecemeal it. Same with the union, share it. NDAs keep people from getting information they need to get on board with the direction (if there is one) the union is going in. Instead we are left rudderless to fill in the blanks as we see fit.