Originally Posted by
LoitaHills
This reminds me of PSA's former MECC, ST's break from the unity of the WO subsidiaries 10 years ago so PSA could get RJs on the property.
Be careful what you ask for. "Those who ignore history are bound to repeat it." ~Santayana
I wouldn't argue that point. You will get more yes votes. Without ST doing that they certainly would have no planes at PSA. I don't care to get into that argument because it depends who you ask what story you get.....
The dork would have certainly been gone. So I'm afraid you'll get many saying ST made a great move although it screwed junior guys and made a contract 10 years which ultimately is my biggest gripe. 10 year CBAs are too long. Trapping you ultimately into a 15 year deal.....
No planes? You are stuck in your little microcosm not seeing the big picture.
Everybody refuses concessions.
Then Management has to bring you the planes at a reasonable contracted rate. It only works when everybody fights together.
It's a simple and old saying...
United we stand; divided we fall.
Stop dividing the limited supply of pilots. Vote no.
They'll be back; they won't have a choice.