View Single Post
Old 09-13-2013 | 08:09 AM
  #135  
aileronjam's Avatar
aileronjam
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 5
From: It keeps changing.
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA
You do realize that, as characterized by your MC, UAL furloughed pilots were integrated with active pilots in "unprecedented" numbers, meaning more than ever in HISTORY ... and when you look at that history, rarely or very rarely (like almost never) have inactive pilots integrated above active pilots. If you are that peeved, perhaps you should have chosen CAL instead of UAL? But then again, sometimes, I guess some folks don't have to live with the decisions they make.
Reading comprehension must not be your strong suit. Let me simplify it for you with font enhancements.

The point that was being made is that not ALL furloughed UAL pilots were integrated among active CAL pilots. There are many that were placed behind CAL pilots whom had the same category and status (ie: zero) with FAR less longevity. To lump ALL furloughed UAL pilots into one category of pilots whom received a great award result is disingenuous at best.

Not every UAL furloughed pilot received such a great deal as the CAL pilots like to point out. It's just not true.
Reply