Originally Posted by paxhauler85

Let me get this straight - your argument is this:

1) We finally got a respectable contract, but because its "so rich," we could afford to give up even more.

2) This is acceptable because we would edge out a lesser compensated competitor by a thin margin.

3) Said competitor is in contract negotiations, with a contract that expired 3.5 years ago.
E
4) Said competitor is growing, and will likely make gains in the very near future.

5) PSA taking concessions for 30 airplanes and interviews at Airways is STILL acceptable.

You're questioning MY logic? Enjoy your weekend.