Originally Posted by
ackattacker
Might want to go back and do a little review of FAR 61.65. I realize 1978 was a long time ago. In addition to the PPL, you need 40 hours of actual or simulated instrument time including 15 hours of instruction. 20 hours of that 40 can be in a flight training device or simulator.
When I got my instrument rating, back in 2000, I had logged a total of about 80 hours flight time, which is pretty close to the realistic minimum.
I agree that not nearly that much time is required - but are you saying that you got your PPL right at 40 hours and then got your instrument in exactly the minimum time prescribed too?
What is the current national average for PPL?
In your last sentence suggests that your 80 is a realistic mimimum.
That I highly doubt.
As far as whether to get an instrument rating or not....absolutely. By far one of the best *safety* related training opportunities available. There is NO DOUBT that it will make you a better pilot. Just be sure to use good decision making when deciding what levels of weather you decide to fly in after getting that rating.
But don't spend too much time building that *experience* base after getting your PPL. A lot of those experince building trips that you want to take could be worked into training opportunities for instrument training. That is extra time and extra cost. Also - it is my opinion to get out and away from your home field. Experience different airports, different ATC, different weather conditions (within reason) during your training and time building expeditions after your IR. the real time building is required after you IR and your next step in professional development - the Commercial certificate.