Originally Posted by
PeopleMover90
It's additional airplanes = quicker upgrade. All the conspiracies of replacing 200s is simply not true before the leases are up.
Section header in the TA states larger RJs so doubtful it's 700s.but even if it is, how is it a paycut? We are getting paid the same rates. 1+1=2
This kid is hopeless. He's obviously locked in a GDP (Gimme 'Da Planes !!!) mentality and is totally blinded by managements false light.
- It's only ONE additional plane guaranteed, is it not ?
- A "promise" of mainline interview only (no flow) and if you're turned down for any reason (perhaps they need you at PSA more ?), your pay is frozen, is it not ?
- Your healthcare costs will skyrocket many times over and above your feeble pay rates that are reset to lower longevity and frozen if your ejection seat to US Airways malfunctions.
Just a few tidbits there. If you're gullible enough to believe the bedtime fairy tale you're being read, I guess you're self-centered enough to rationalize throwing everyone else under the bus for a long-shot chance to benefit at the expense of others.
To those that rationalize this garbage by thinking, "oh well, if we don't do this, they'll just go elsewhere", that may be true, but A. they'll have to get an already cheaper outfit to do it and B. even if they can, that outfit cannot get enough flying to make this strategy successful as they'll still have to spread flying among several carriers for strike protection purposes. The more regionals (especially CORE regionals) that reject this strategy, the more likely it is to fail. Sadly, there will be those who are cluelessly unslavageable like PM90, but the key is to get the majority to SEE the strategy and DEFEAT the strategy instead of rationalizing capitualtion as acceptable, especially if there is an outside chance at self-benefit.
PM90 has already spun-in and his wreckage is smoking on managements lawn, so time to move on and try to shepard still flying aircraft back to the correct home base.