Originally Posted by
LeineLodge
Now you're the one spinning again (anyone surprised?) The bolded part above is absolutely NOT true. The contract is most certainly not self-funding. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but it was somewhere to the tune of $300M/year extra cost to the company, on July 1, 2012. Every extra year of the contract that number grows.
You've pulled this completely out of your backside. Totally made up numbers. Our contract was completely cost neutral to Delta Air Lines. That is unarguable. Not my words, it's the words of Richard and Ed.
Originally Posted by
LeineLodge
What you are confusing (or more likely mis-representing) is the major savings that the company achieved were by accelerating the old RJ's rather than dealing with overhauling engines, heavy checks, high CASM, etc. I think you understand that, yet you continue to repeat this BS to further your agenda.
Spin, spin, spin...
Again, you don't know what you're talking about and you have to resort to the MEC spin. You're not in a position to know anything about what you've written. Delta management is. And Delta management has said over and over again that C2012 is cost neutral to Delta Air Lines.
Carl