Originally Posted by
tsquare
but if you think for a second that MR Anderson is going to go there because of some twisted sense of loyalty to ancient agreements that NWA had, you are smoking crack.
Translation: If Delta wasn't the one that had the ancient agreement, then that agreement is worthless anyway.
Originally Posted by
tsquare
It is a business decision pure and simple. And again I will ask, what leverage do you think we have to force Mr Anderson to continue flying there if it doesn't make money?
It's a business decision based on whether Delta can get that protective language removed from our Section 1. If they can scare us (again) into removing the language, then one business decision will be made. If not, then another business decision will be made.
Carl