Originally Posted by
alfaromeo
There are two signatures on any new LOA, ours and the company's. If you don't consider what the company is thinking then you will fail every time.
I don't care what the company is thinking because I don't want their signature on this new LOA. They're the ones that want this.
Originally Posted by
alfaromeo
It sounds sexy to say "Give me, give me, I demand this and that." and then when you fail at least you can pat your own back and crow for the crowd. If you actually want to accomplish something, you have to consider their point of view.
Unresponsive drivel. Nobody is saying: "Give me, give me, I demand this and that." This is just another straw man of statements only you are making, so you can make people sound unreasonable. In the end, you're just carrying the water for DALPA/management...same stuff.
Originally Posted by
alfaromeo
In the company's point of view, they see 15 pax a day. This provision in the PWA has been there for years and it's 15 not 1500, that is reality. So when they are considering giving away something, their return on investment is viewed as 15 pax a day. That is how they view it and no amount of personal attacks on your part is going to change it. If you want their signature on a document then you have to consider what they want.
I don't want their signature on a document alfa, they want OURS on a document. And again you have to ask: Why does management want this SO BAD for only 15 pax per day?
Carl