I think the reason some of the judgments seem harsh is that they're not based on upcoming reports, but on leaks/rumors yet to be proved or disproved. Out of respect for the person that told me what might be the inside story, and for SW, I'm not going to expand.

I've long been a critic of SWA's culture when it comes to safety, but many on here have argued convincingly that my views were outdated. They're probably right.

Based on what think I "know", this person was an outlier, who doesn't represent the men and women that fly for SW very well.

Based on the actual evidence released to date, you might be right to say the judgment is harsh.

Of course, SWA has the evidence you and I don't have or can't validate, and it doesn't look like they erred in firing the Captain.