Originally Posted by
R57 relay
The binding arbitration is embedded in the TA. The TA has never been completed and this kills it. Read Captain Hogg's(US management) comments when he refused David Braid's grievance. Sums the MOU up just like I understood it.
Funny, the usapa officers and committee members didn't agree on what 10 h meant or who wrote it, yet you have a complete understanding.
"h. US Airways agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the JCBA shall provide a basis for
changing the seniority lists currently in effect at US Airways other than through the process set forth in
this Paragraph 10."
There is also paragraph 19, which allows for parts of the mou to be invalidated:
Paragraph 24, shall remain in effect after the Effective Date even if this
Memorandum is subsequently deemed to be unenforceable or nullified for any reason, and that these provisions are severable from the other terms of this Memorandum.
So it is possible 10h is invalidated and the rest of the mou stays. 10h "Severable" if the judge wants to do it.