Originally Posted by
R57 relay
What does that mean? Have you followed those grievances?
The snapback was a loser, not intended. But the company used the language that was later grieved to get that win. I know you hate USAPA, but can't you admit that the RLA grievance policy is flawed?
Did usapa agree to go to "final and binding arbitration" to settle the grievance? Did usapa just hire a law firm to attempt and get out of "final and binding"? As to my question of "what it means" I think it is very clear. The east pilots cannot be trusted to live up to any agreements EVER. The notion the west give up "SOMETHING" is ridiculous on it's face since the east cannot and will not live up to any agreements, it's in the DNA of the east pilots.