^^ Anyone interested in copy-pasting this non-compete/training contract clause so many of us on the outside wanting in can make an educated decision? It seems there is interpretation between furloughees, wholly owned, and just contract feed companies.

Personally, I'm not interested in my labor/skills being strong-armed into a corner for two years by company lawyers taking advantage of my meager economic means preventing me from mounting my own defense. I bristle at these tactics. The free movement of labor is part of what supposedly makes this economic system work.

If my time and skills are going to be more appropriately compensated elsewhere, that should be saying something to the employer. This clause could indicate that they are well aware that the compensation package is not necessarily sufficient.