Thread: SWA Rumor Mill
View Single Post
Old 11-18-2013 | 05:54 AM
  #42  
tsquare's Avatar
tsquare
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by MWright

Perhaps you guys will now see the heartburn over giving up gates to airlines who have shown no interest in Love over the past 34 years. I would hardly call the pile of restrictions on their flying out of Love a "competitive advantage." The only reason that SWA has a "monopoly" out of Love is because the other airlines have: 1) Failed to make money doing the same restricted flying that SWA does, or 2) Not shown any interest in serving the airport.

Not really. Unless you care to address the fact that slot controlled airports in NY have, until recently held zero interest to SWA, but now they should be allowed zero bid (basically) contracts to those gates. Why should they get those gates over DAL or UAL or AMR for that matter?
Reply