Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
This is EXACTLY what the DPA leadership knew would happen if they moved the investigation forward to the FBI. We knew that none of the ALPA apologists would take a step back and question whether breaking Federal law was appropriate work for the Special Committee. We knew the ALPA apologists would spin it as an outrage that DPA would even investigate the issue since it might harm the HACKER!
Simple question Bar. What if I as a DPA supporter wanted to help my cause along by hacking into ALPA national's website, redirect it to a fake site that denigrated ALPA, then disconnected the funding link to the ALPA PAC. Would you argue to ALPA that they shouldn't investigate it because old Carl might get in legal trouble?
The question is rhetorical because there's no possibility you'd defend my actions. Like I've told you many times before, your outrage is fake, selective, and highly partisan.
Carl
I'm questioning whether there actually was a "hacker" at all. You guys howl about transparency. Show me the evidence. Until then I'll be left to wonder if this is a publicity stunt.