Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
There is a big difference between taking no action on a matter that does not involve a pilot's professional duties and the sort of attempt at malicious prosection the DPA is attempting.
Since you know the law as well as I do, I'm curious as to why you keep attempting this distortion. You're truly embarrassing yourself Bar. Plus you've still refused to answer my previous question to you.
Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
The DPA leadership is nuts enough to think this leads back to ALPA and there is something they can use for political gain. IMHO, that's the kind of politics (involving the cops) that we don't need. Pilot on pilot prosecution? Given that the DPA may be screwing the pilots' employment (Delta is hiring pilots and needs staffing) the DPA may be unwittingly picking a fight with Delta management. Delta probably does not want pilots going outside the Company to try to get other employees in trouble over a matter of union politics. Management , by law they have to deal with whoever represents the Delta pilots and does not have a dog in that fight, but if people don't come to work, then it becomes a management problem.
You're making Saul Alinsky very proud you little radical you. What a completely embarrassing and emotional tirade.
Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
Again, the DPA appears to be making bad decisions based on emotive reaction rather than strategic thought, JMHO.
Again, Bucking Bar displays no shame in knowing Federal law, but refusing to accurately state it in order to prop up a discredited ALPA.
Carl