Originally Posted by
Wiskey Driver
Actually it is I that has pity for you. I see you must stick your beak into our business and then don't have the decency to gather all the information before you post. I use words like "SCAB" to describe those who would bust a union to for the express purpose of serving themselves at the expense of the other. I fight with anger as most do but I guess where you live you fight while giggling your way to an eventual *** kicking huh? The reason that you so keenly missed is that we went to and agreed upon process called arbitration, maybe you've heard of the process. We did our part and we honored our obligations but I guess we should all just laugh it off while fighting according to you skewed logic.
This obviously has nothing to do with you yet you come here read the thread then pick people out of the crowd in which to hurl your insults. How about this, take yourself back to where ever you came from and go fight the laughing fight.
WD at AWA
Well, it is a public board. So I am free to express my opinion at will.
Besides, everything that goes on in this business has to do with everyone else; pattern bargaining an all. While you and the East quibble, you are bringing down the bargaining capability of everyone else. So, yeah, it has something to do with me.
You can save it, because I already know your retort. If those &@(#(* East guys would just live by their obligations you would have already had the best contract in place in the history of airlines. Your argument smacks of the entitled Comair clan, and every other airline group who overplays their hand.
You use words like SCAB because you have nothing but emotion in your actions. AWA has never done ANYTHING for the airline industry except be an anchor around the neck of compensation packages, and leading the charge to change age 60; now
that reeks of the S word.
Neither East nor West had leverage for a collective agreement. The Mediator blew it in the list several times, the events since have proven that statement to be correct. Neither side is willing to budge because both know exactly what deal they got. ALPA knew it as well, and changed the M&A language.
Even when challenged, all you can come up with is "I know you are, but what am I?"
Pathetic, but I'm not surprised.