Originally Posted by
R57 relay
Who's deposition? Kirby's or Hummel's? I can't find one from Kirby on cactuspilot.com or the USAPA website. I have read Hummel's and will copy the relevant parts. I wondered why you guys didn't call Kirby to testify, as he could have refuted Hummel.
· · ·A.· ·So at that meeting Dave Bates, his
·8· overriding concern was on how USAPA was going to
·9· handle their current seniority integration issue
10· and would that be handled prior to any merger with
11· American.· And that concern was answered by Scott
12· Kirby, who made it perfectly clear that we weren't
13· going to deal with seniority in any way, shape or
14· form, that the McCaskill-Bond process would allow
15· us to deal with that at a later date, that we would
16· be able to work towards an MOU provided that there
17· was no discussion on seniority and that the
18· seniority issue would be dealt with after the
19· merger.
Are you that stupid? Read what you wrote and then read what usapa claims the mou does. Kirby saYs mou is not to deal with seniority, now usapa claims what? Oh yeah, mou does away with Nic. Is that what Kirby said the mou was suppose to do? Is that what usapa told the west mou would do? Btw, that was taken from a deposition not trial testimony.