Originally Posted by SewerPipeDvr

Sorry to drive someone nuts, BUT, one small question. Who had a LEGAL responsibility to report what Sec10 stated? The west BPR reps had NO legal responsibility to report to the west voters. So anything about them is immaterial and not allowed in trial. Only USAPA held that LEGAL responsibility. Did USAPA tell the west voters what was in Sec 10? Not from what was reported in open testimony. The Company will use you against yourselves.

What matters -----> The Company and Siegal won this case. Read the Siegal's filings and you will know what is going to happen. You people are just along for the ride with no real say in the outcome. MB will decide. The east will not be "punished" in MB. The west will get slotted close to NIC. Letting this go to MB will solve the Company's legal responsibility. They got their cake (seven years of idiot pilots fighting while getting paid table scraps) and no legal jeopardy. Thats a win in anyone's book. Those that can pay the best, wins. Not to rub salt into wounds but I believe if the east had kept Seham and LISTENED to his advice the east would have pulled this off to the end. Too bad there are too many "legal experts" on the east. He who represents himself has a fool for a attorney. Happily retired (from flying in 1983)