Originally Posted by
Scott Stoops
ALPA is its pilots. Are you freaking kidding me?
Your lack of knowledge of how this industry works is stunning in its breadth and scope. Again, good luck as you clearly have no frame of reference if you actually believe that the CAL proposal would have flown. These were 3 neutral arb's that looked at both proposals and completely disregarded one. They disregarded the one that you clearly believe was fair.
Scott
I could say the same about you. Never said the cal lists was fair. Didn't agree with, said that from the beginning. It had me with 320 ca when I myself could not hold 737 ca. Thought it should go relative seniority of active pilots with a fence on the 747 to compensate for the extra wide bodies. Our 787 coming before yours without a fence would have compensated for the extra 777 you had. Everybody would have been ****ed but the outcome would have been fair. Or you could have taken all WB pilots from both groups and merged them relative and then gone to the narrow body. All of that seems a little more fair then putting a reserve 320 fo in front of a senior 737 fo. And ALPA is it's pilots, however they forgot they had responsibilities to cal pilots as well. So I will now forget about being responsible for ALPA.