View Single Post
Old 12-18-2013 | 08:36 AM
  #15  
REF 5
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 641
Likes: 125
From: 737CA
Default

Originally Posted by Tankerhead
Incredibly shortsighted to "cease" at these three, and many/most of the other 17 FATcities.
Most were FAT cities but so what. If they can't money or better yet get better yields out of other routes or cities then it's a no brainer. Airtran may have made money in those cities under their cost structure but can't under SWA. If anything it shows good discipline in making sure they run a profitable operation. That's all that matters in the end.
Reply