Originally Posted by
Scoop
No . I am suggesting just the opposite. If they push out long call assignments from the current 12 hours to 19 hours - how is that giving up a quality of life provision?
As far as "simply because they said so." You are missing the part where I say if they don't come off their current negotiating stance we should simply comply with the contract - you and I are in total agreement here.
Finally as far as the JV and sick leave goes - This is a separate issue. The FARs have changed - the way we operate will change.
How many time do I have to repeat - If the company insists on 2-3 hour long call assignments we should simply comply with the contract?
Scoop
Scoop,
I'm sorry if I'm misreading your post. I think you're saying that 9 hours is 9 hours, right? Assuming they would make the minimum call out 19 hours on long call... correct? Ok, I see what you are saying. That's an entirely new ball of wax that would change short call obligations as well. Many pieces of the puzzle left to fit.