Originally Posted by
Herkflyr
Another amusing "there is my opinion, and then there is the wrong one" view. Just because you prefer 12-hour min layovers doesn't mean that anyone not sharing your opinion doesn't "value his health."
The new 10 hour hard minimum layover is reasonable. The rules under part 121 were not.
I agree. I think once the dust settles on all this, we'll realize how much better 117 is than what we had.
My record before 117 was 9:35 block time in one day... plus no more reduced rest. It's far from perfect but it certainly is better.
I of course did break a record and hit 33 hours in a 7 day period to cross over into the new year, but I didn't really notice it... all the days were pretty short and efficient.