Thread: Hub and Spoke
View Single Post
Old 02-02-2006, 08:10 AM
  #2  
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,322
Default

Originally Posted by ryane946
What does everyone think of the hub and spoke system. In my opinion, if you want to move passengers from some obscure point A to some point C, the most efficient way is to route them through point B, the hub.

For as long as I can think of (10,20,30 years), just about every airline has had some sort of a hub and spoke system. While low cost carriers have a few point to point routes, they still mainly have a hub and spoke system. Southwest is the only airline I can think of that uses mainly point to point routes.

The reason why I ask this question is because I was reading Southwest's January operational preformance, and while their load factor was up 4% for january, it was up from 58%, by far the lowest load factor in the industry. Would Southwest be a better and more efficient airline if they used a hub and spoke system?
While SWA irritates me in some ways, they are very good at their niche which is point to point (sometimes through multiple points). This works for them because they stay within certain parameters, but these parameters also limit the scope of their operation and the service they provide:

737s only: Saves money, but insufficient range for international. also too large of an aircraft to economically serve Yuma, AZ or San Louis Obispo, CA.

One Class: Simplifies and speeds boarding, permiting quick turns. Does not appeal to high $$$ travelers.

Easy Airports: Serves only airports with weather and traffic conditions which allow for minimal delays (SNA vice LAX, OAK vice SFO, etc).

Basically what they do is find city pairs that offer a sweet spot for their operations, and move in. A few cities are so dense w/ SWA that they sort of function as a mini-hub (PHX, LAS, etc).

The hub & spoke system by contrast is designed to provide full service to/from small, medium, large, and Internation destinations. LCC's are only a bargain if they happen to serve the cities where you want to go. Also if you fly for business and build up frequent flyer miles on SWA, you get a free vacation in Vegas or Cleveland. Those same miles on a legacy could get you to Milan or Barcelona and/or first class upgrades.

SWA's current growth and success is driven by their fuel hedge, not by any performamnce factors. They are good in their niche, and smart enough to stay there (it is a pretty big niche).
rickair7777 is offline