Originally Posted by
Bobman80
I absolutely understand what you are saying. All I'm saying is they aren't following this procedure correctly and they have been not following it two out of two in the last month.
If we're not going to squawk when they don't follow procedures, then who will?
It sounds to me as though the company is trying to prevent the trip from going back into the open time ladder, because they're concerned it won't be covered, considering the conflict between 117 and the PWA. In other words, they're trying to mitigate/hide the issues.
We're negotiating on this point right now. I'm not advocating anything out of the ordinary, only to enforce the contract. The company is violating the status-quo, in the two instances you describe, and this needs to be highlighted.