View Single Post
Old 02-14-2014 | 06:50 AM
  #10  
block30's Avatar
block30
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
My understanding is that as the rules are currently written, GA aircraft of the C-172 weight class have to meet certification standards that apply to bigger/heavier airplanes. There is no differentiation. This is where a vast majority of the development cost is tagged on. Plus there has been no real revisit to the rules in decades to take into account new manufacturing techniques, technology, etc.

Look at a new C-182, there's probably no more than a few thousand bucks worth of aluminum, and it's using a 1940's era engine with mechanical magnetos. Yet a new one is almost a half million bucks. I'm not saying gov't regulation and certification standards haven't helped improve safety, but the free market has a way of taking care of that too.
Yeah, good point. I hope the new government stance strikes a lot better balance between government regulation and letting the free market work.
Reply