Originally Posted by wiggy

I don't know, something is fishy here, let's try some logic:

Premise (1)
If, as you say, she enjoyed her break by reading my post, my post must have caused her to enjoy her break. Things that cause one to enjoy one's break are enjoyable. Ergo, she enjoyed reading my post.

Premise (2)
Daughters will sometimes not tell the truth to please their fathers.
Because of its content, R-57s daughter knew her father would be displeased if she reported she enjoyed the post.

But by premise (1) she enjoyed the post.

Ergo, she did not tell R-57 the truth when she said the post was awful.

Conclusion: R-57 has been deceived by his daughter.