Originally Posted by
sailingfun
A couple of things are confusing on this thread. One is that the tail clearance on the 767-400 is greater then on the 300. No tail strike issues at Delta.
As far as the 900ER at least on the version Delta purchased the approach speeds are lower then the 800 and the stopping distances shorter. Depending on weight 200 to 900 feet shorter.
Takeoff distances and rejected takeoff performance is also better. Approach speed on the 900ER at 140,000lbs is 136 knots verses 139 on the 800. Rate of climb to 30,000 feet is identical. Above 30k the 900 lags the 800 by about 200fpm.
I love flying the -900. Ain't no big deal. Don't know if other carriers versions are different but DAL's are nice and tight. Only different is the initial climb depending on weight. I think maybe our motors are higher rated. No worries here.