View Single Post
Old 03-04-2014 | 09:29 AM
  #150654  
forgot to bid's Avatar
forgot to bid
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It was an interesting mistake because those who lobbied for it seemed not to care that the application of their proposed rule would not have prevented either Comair 5191 or Colgan 3407.

Your average armchair shrink can listen to the CVR and come to the conclusion that what was a factor in both accidents was, outsourcing.

The Comair CVR was a discussion of job loss and displacements punctuated by a few checklists. The Colgan CVR was all about maintenance staffing problems, the FO's plans to get a job at Alaska because her pay did not allow her housing situation to keep up with the airline's movement. The Captain was also dreaming the whole flight about his future career ... not the task at hand.
I agree.

But I will say the ATP CTP was the right action but I'd drop the aviation university part of it. No offense.

I've not read the entire FAA AC on it but will it be required by everyone prior to being hired by a Part 121 airline whether or not they already have a weekend ATP?

no matter what the ATP is we know it was a joke.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 03-04-2014 at 09:41 AM.