Originally Posted by
Crawl
What about the language in the TA that basically says the company doesn't have to fulfil its obligations pending such events "including, but not limited to..." Bam, fleet guarantee out the window. Pay scales stick around.
I'm not familiar with what you're saying, I didn't read the entire TA so you may very well be correct.
But from what I did read the only thing that could be construed as vague and ambiguous in that regards was in Paragraph G of the Enhanced Flow Rights LOA, which talks about aircraft deliveries as it pertains to the Flow LOA. Take a look at it and you will see what I mean.
Aside from wild speculation of oil spikes, wars, and mass catastrophes, it seems quite unambiguous about the fleet and flow. We can sit here all days and say what if about any black swan event but that seems futile. And as I pointed out in my previous post, if in fact the fleet guarantee is firm, if such an event happened, you may be happy you had that minimum frames language.
In any case, I'm quite indifferent about the outcome. I'm just throwing things out there for thought and am not trying to argue with you or others because I can definitely understand where you're coming from and see your point of view.