Originally Posted by
eaglefly
that's probably the result that would have happened had both sides compromised in the first place. Both sides will be ****ed and thats how you know the proper outcome was achieved.
I thought binding arbitration by a neutral was a compromise? I guess the west must compromise on the compromise? If the west gets a voice there is no doubt the Nic will be presented by our side. Us/Awa merged in 2005 and the Nic reflects the equities in place in 2005. Do you think for one minute the arbitrators will take an east/west snap shot of December 9th 2013? I doubt that very much.