I remember very recently on this website many of you saying to analyze the content of a message and not the author.

Now those very same people are on here attacking the author without giving any thought to the message.

Your personal feelings towards the author doesn't diminish the validity of the facts she puts forward. You don't have to agree or disagree but it is no different than the NO letters written by Rich, Gavin, and the daily emails we now get from Val.

Both sides of the debate have a right to express their views as long as they are not attacking people personally...which seems to be very difficult for the NO side to do.