Originally Posted by
seafeye
If she is a journalist she should check her facts and not be biased.
She is incorrect in her statements and she omited writing the cons of the agreement.
Nothing she said was incorrect. I'm sorry, but just because you don't agree with a point of view doesn't make it wrong.
I agree that it didn't mention any potential downside...but none of the letters we get from Val, Rich, or any of the NO letters ever acknowledge any of the TA's positives.