View Single Post
Old 03-30-2014 | 05:21 PM
  #37  
brianb
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
From: Airbus 319/320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi
"Bad landing" does not equal "crash". Impending doom is different than a "bad landing".

Now I can always structure posts like we're reading a manual, to attempt to cover every possible angle, but I tend to trust that people can make reasonable inferences on some things. Obviously it's hard to cover every possible angle. Though based on the remainder of my earlier post (like the part about safe vs unsafe, my qualifier of "don't particularly care about", and I do care about porpoising, it would be rather unreasonable to think otherwise) you could reasonably infer that while I might let someone drive it into the pavement or get lost in a crosswind, I generally won't let them trash the machine.



Not on anything I fly. If that was a limitation I'd know about it and behave accordingly. Also sounds like an Airbus thing.
Airbus system logic dictates that if BOTH pilot's are using their side sticks at the same time, the inputs will be summed. Air France is a good example.
Reply