Originally Posted by
Thedude
When you have guys that were on property with AA for less than a year and then furloughed vs US guys that are third-listers that have been on property for 5+ yrs. Is it fair for the AA guys that were barely on property to go senior to the guys that have been there for 5+ yrs? I would think not.
Personally, I think it will go LoS with fences.
I am a third lister and I don't know anyone that feels this would be fair. I don't want to advance at the expense of someone else.