View Single Post
Old 04-17-2014 | 01:11 PM
  #154190  
GunshipGuy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Gunship Guy,

The reason the Supreme Court gets to make interpretations is because that is their job description. They are kinda unique as Courts go, don't you think?

As for precedent, there is none. Action taken under a reservation of rights is not precedent. Wiki's your buddy Reservation of rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bet a negotiated resolution happens before we could get a grievance hearing....
The Dude, you're looking at my take like an engineer with a micrometer when in reality the world is not all black and white. People who have the final say in these matters are people, and people are swayed (consciously and unconsciously) by a multitude of factors. Read "Thinking Fast and Slow". As much as we think we're impartial and can be fair no matter the circumstances, we aren't 100% always like an impartial machine in our thought process--we're all human. My point was simple: delaying for months and months could give one the impression the matter was not as significant to the interested party as it might have been had they taken action (e.g. filing a grievance) on day one.