Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
Gunship Guy,
The reason the Supreme Court gets to make interpretations is because that is their job description. They are kinda unique as Courts go, don't you think?
As for precedent, there is none. Action taken under a reservation of rights is not precedent. Wiki's your buddy
Reservation of rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bet a negotiated resolution happens before we could get a grievance hearing....
The Dude, you're looking at my take like an engineer with a micrometer when in reality the world is not all black and white. People who have the final say in these matters are people, and people are swayed (consciously and unconsciously) by a multitude of factors. Read "Thinking Fast and Slow". As much as we think we're impartial and can be fair no matter the circumstances, we aren't 100% always like an impartial machine in our thought process--we're all human. My point was simple: delaying for months and months could give one the impression the matter was not as significant to the interested party as it might have been had they taken action (e.g. filing a grievance) on day one.