Originally Posted by
eaglefly
Yes, I'm still lost Mr. Astaire. The issue isn't work rules, it's the SLI and USAPA's timeline for relevance. You agreed to it and no one changed anything. Tap dance all you want though, but might I suggest a top hat and cane ?
Oh Ginger.
Let me try again. You
claim that USAPA is trying to change things after the fact, I show you evidence where the APA has done just that in another area, and why I don't trust them.
You make this big issue of USAPA agreeing to SCS. It's not a big deal and as a matter of fact, it's irrelevant. SCS has to happen and with the numbers, it will be the APA. So yeah, USAPA agreed to the obvious, it just didn't agree to waive it's rights under a federal statute as the APA is claiming, using Judge Silver's dicta.
So, the MOU and it's terms are in dispute. USAPA decided to go one way to settle the dispute, the company and the APA say that it has to be settled another way. We'll see.
You yourself said that the only reason you support the APA's interpretation is because they will be the CBA. You said that if there was a chance that USAPA could be the CBA, then you wouldn't support them running the whole show. I think you actually see the absurdity of one group coming in and taking over the whole process, and are a hypocrite.