Originally Posted by
Firsttimeflyer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevets
Next, even if ASA wasn't ALPA, federal law requires a fair and equitable integration.
The ONLY thing you got correct is that they XJT MEC rolled over on enforcing our holding letter.
You seriously need to learn how to multi-quote. It is sad that you have as many posts as you do and you are too ignorant to figure out how to quote people properly.
Fair and equitable integration? How about you ask the ALPA represented AirTran pilot group about fair and equitable.
SWA/ATN can't happen in this situation because both ASA and XJT have alter ego language in their respective contracts (and was also spelled out in the T&PA), which ATN doesn't have and thus the coercion from their CEO. But I'm sure you knew that. All that fair and equitable means is that a neutral third party (arbitrator) decides or the pilots come to a mutual agreement (neither of which happened in the case of SWA/ATN). Look up LPPs section 3 & 13 of Allegheny-Mohawk. That's what prevails in the instance ASA/XJT aren't represented by the same bargaining agent.
Anyway, I'm on my phone and this app doesn't seem to be user friendly when it comes to quoting. But if you have such a big problem with it, oh well.